Technical leadership · consulting · advisory — Vienna

I know the layer beneath your problem.

Most technical advisors start at the application layer. I start at the electrons and stop at the cloud — as one person who has owned the transitions in between.

  • 09AI & MLModels that have to run on the device
  • 08Cloud & dataCost, reliability, data ownership
  • 07SaaS, web & appsWhat the customer actually sees
  • 06System architectureWhere the hardware/software line falls
  • 05IoT & connectivityRadio, protocols, field updates
  • 04Embedded & firmwareReal time, memory, power budget
  • 03FPGA & ASICWhen software is too slow
  • 02PCB & signalsSignal integrity, EMC, manufacturability
  • 01Physics & electronsWhy it works. Or doesn't.
  • Technical Leadership

    Fractional or interim CTO

  • Technical Consulting

    A scoped engagement

  • Technical Advisory

    Advisory board and due diligence

The difference

Extra hands solve a different problem than a wrong decision.

Both are legitimate. They are just not the same job, not the same role, and not the same person.

Engineering capacity

Solves throughput. The backlog gets shorter and the team moves faster.

  • Tickets get closed
  • The decisions stay exactly where they were
  • Available from many, comparable, replaceable

Technical leadership

Solves direction. The expensive mistakes rarely happen inside a function — they happen in an architecture, an interface, a supplier, or a hire.

  • Decisions get made, argued and written down
  • The team gets more senior, not just faster
  • It still holds once I am gone

If you need both, start with direction. You can buy the capacity more precisely afterwards — and usually cheaper.

How we work

Three ways to engage me.

Technical leadership for products made of hardware and software. Pick the situation, not the title.

01

Technical Leadership

Fractional or interim CTO

I take the role, not just the question: set direction, decide the architecture, lead the team, and represent the technology to management and investors.

  • Technical roadmap and priorities
  • Engineering team, roles and hiring
  • Managing suppliers and agencies
  • Reporting a board can actually read

WhenWhen technical decisions are due and nobody owns them.

02

Technical Consulting

A scoped engagement

One question, one deadline, one result. No open-ended retainer and no eighty slides — an answer solid enough that you can work from it without me.

  • Architecture and stack review
  • Make-or-buy and supplier selection
  • Cyber Resilience Act: SBOM, secure-by-design, deadlines
  • A project has stalled — find out why

WhenWhen the question is specific and the deadline is close.

03

Technical Advisory

Advisory board and due diligence

An independent technical judgement for people about to put money on technology — with no interest of my own in who builds it afterwards.

  • Technical due diligence
  • Advisory board seat, ongoing
  • Support through funding rounds
  • A second opinion on a large decision

WhenWhen a round, an acquisition or a governance gap is coming up.

How we start

You don't have to trust me. You have to watch me work.

Nobody hands a leadership mandate to someone they don't know yet. So every engagement starts with a piece of work that is worth something on its own — and that either side can walk away from.

  1. 01

    Position fix

    Two to four weeks, clearly scoped. I work through the system, the team, the roadmap, the suppliers and the risks, and write up where you actually stand, with the findings in priority order.

    ResultA document that stays useful even if we never speak again.

  2. 02

    Decision

    You decide on scope and rhythm — or against it. No automatic renewal, no minimum term, no follow-up calls.

    ResultClarity on both sides, with nobody having to sell anything.

  3. 03

    Working together

    A fixed rhythm, clear ownership, decisions written down. One to two days a week covers most mandates.

    ResultDecisions get made instead of postponed.

Most people start at step one. It costs you a few weeks and leaves you with an honest outside read on where you stand — whichever way you go afterwards.

Request a position fix

Succession

The point is that you stop needing me.

Plenty of companies would rather grow technical leadership in-house than buy it indefinitely. That is the right instinct. It rarely fails on willingness — it fails because the person meant to grow into the role has nobody to measure themselves against.

  • I make the decisions that are due now — and explain, every time, why they came out that way.
  • I build up the person meant to take the seat: reviews, structure, cover, honest feedback.
  • I write down what I know instead of taking it with me.
  • I hand over to a named person, on a date — not into a vacuum.

A good mandate ends with someone in-house holding the role. Anything else is a subscription.

Where the depth comes from

Nine layers, none of them from a textbook.

Over fifteen years of technology — detector electronics at CERN, enterprise software at umdasch Group, and a SaaS company of my own as CTO. I have laid out boards, written firmware, brought up FPGAs, owned architectures, and read cloud bills nobody in the building could explain. So when something breaks, I can usually tell which layer it is in — and, more usefully, which layer it is not in.

See the full CV
  • CERN — detector electronics, measurement, instrumentation
  • umdasch Group — enterprise software and system architecture
  • SaaS founder — CTO, product and team built from zero
  • Hardware, embedded and IoT through to cloud and AI, in one person
  • Vienna — on site in Austria, remote across the DACH region
What I don't know, I pick up faster than you could hire for it.

Let's talk about the layer where it's stuck.

Thirty minutes, no obligation. Afterwards you'll know whether I'm useful to you — and I'll tell you if I'm not.

Book an intro call